Bug#544848: [ion3] license change, consider for main?

2009-09-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:27 +0200, Olof Johansson wrote: Package: ion3 Severity: wishlist Hello! Upstream has just modified the license somewhat and removed the 28 days clause[0]. I wonder if this is enough to consider it for main? No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in

Bug#544848: [ion3] license change, consider for main?

2009-09-05 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
quote who=Ben Hutchings date=Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:30:01PM +0100 No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in derivatives are still too restrictive. However, I will remove the obnoxious debconf warning. Do you really think so? DFSG 4's The license may require derived works to carry a

Bug#544848: [ion3] license change, consider for main?

2009-09-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 23:51 -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: quote who=Ben Hutchings date=Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:30:01PM +0100 No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in derivatives are still too restrictive. However, I will remove the obnoxious debconf warning. Do you really think so?

Bug#544848: [ion3] license change, consider for main?

2009-09-03 Thread Olof Johansson
Package: ion3 Severity: wishlist Hello! Upstream has just modified the license somewhat and removed the 28 days clause[0]. I wonder if this is enough to consider it for main? Thanks for your consideration [0] https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/ion-general/2009-September/002520.html -- Olof