On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:27 +0200, Olof Johansson wrote:
Package: ion3
Severity: wishlist
Hello!
Upstream has just modified the license somewhat and removed the 28
days clause[0]. I wonder if this is enough to consider it for main?
No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in
quote who=Ben Hutchings date=Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:30:01PM +0100
No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in derivatives are still too
restrictive. However, I will remove the obnoxious debconf warning.
Do you really think so? DFSG 4's The license may require derived works
to carry a
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 23:51 -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
quote who=Ben Hutchings date=Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:30:01PM +0100
No, the conditions on use of the name 'Ion' in derivatives are still too
restrictive. However, I will remove the obnoxious debconf warning.
Do you really think so?
Package: ion3
Severity: wishlist
Hello!
Upstream has just modified the license somewhat and removed the 28
days clause[0]. I wonder if this is enough to consider it for main?
Thanks for your consideration
[0] https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/ion-general/2009-September/002520.html
--
Olof
4 matches
Mail list logo