Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 07:45:29PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:54:03AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: I second this comment. The other possibility is to provide a dummy transitional emacs23-gtk package, but the current

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-28 Thread Rob Browning
Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes: My bad, sorry. Then I'm unclear why apt(itude) didn't automatically offer to replace emacs23-gtk with emacs23? Any ideas, anyone? Not sure. Any chance you might have been going to -3 rather than -4? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-27 Thread Rob Browning
Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes: On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:54:03AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: I second this comment. The other possibility is to provide a dummy transitional emacs23-gtk package, but the current situation of the package just vanishing does not work. I added

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
reopen 545405 found 545405 23.1+1-4 thanks On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:04:06AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: Perhaps even the magic Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination? In any case, I don't know if I missed it somehow, but I saw no indication that emacs23-gtk was now emacs23. All

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-24 Thread Rob Browning
Julian Gilbey j...@polya.uklinux.net writes: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:04:06AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: Perhaps even the magic Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination? [...] I looked at the changelog - no mention of this change. I only figured out what was happening when I

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-24 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:54:03AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: Perhaps it wasn't clear enough, but here's what I said in the changelog: * Change emacsVER to be the GTK+ version to match the upstream default, and add an emacsVER-lucid package for those who still want the non-GTK+

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:54:03AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: I second this comment. The other possibility is to provide a dummy transitional emacs23-gtk package, but the current situation of the package just vanishing does not work. I added the Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination

Bug#545405: C+R+P?

2009-09-09 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Perhaps even the magic Conflicts+Replaces+Provides combination? In any case, I don't know if I missed it somehow, but I saw no indication that emacs23-gtk was now emacs23. All I saw was, in aptitude, that emacs23-common-bin was going to be removed due to a dependency conflict, and figured out