Hi,
with or without severity war, the --svn-tag-only option is critical for
the operation of several packaging teams. I think this is why Luca set
the severity to serious despite the apparent lack of impact.
It is currently required to downgrade to do any kind of work with
svn-bp.
Thanks for
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:00:39 +0200
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
with or without severity war, the --svn-tag-only option is critical for
the operation of several packaging teams. I think this is why Luca set
the severity to serious despite the apparent lack of impact.
It is
2009/9/24 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:00:39 +0200
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
with or without severity war, the --svn-tag-only option is critical for
the operation of several packaging teams. I think this is why Luca set
the severity to serious
reopen 535177 0.6.29
quit
crap I'm an idiot. I don't even understand what I did wrong. it worked
fine for me while I was testing it. for now, I'll just revert the
change altogether (since it was half done only anyways, ugh).
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:05:51AM -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote:
reopen 535177 0.6.29
quit
crap I'm an idiot. I don't even understand what I did wrong. it worked
fine for me while I was testing it. for now, I'll just revert the
change altogether (since it was half done only anyways, ugh).
On
5 matches
Mail list logo
