Robert Lemmen rober...@semistable.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:08:36PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Really, i don't think it is a stackoverflow as it fails at a to prominent
cmd count... I have rewritten a few parts of rred to use long and more
sane return values and it patches
this is most certainly related to the way rred currently works, it uses
a tail recursion on the stack to reverse the diff elements. it would be
easy to change that to use an iteration instead, if you want that just
holler and i'll change rred.cc, but i think the real problem is that we
should
2009/11/25 Robert Lemmen rober...@semistable.com:
this is most certainly related to the way rred currently works, it uses
a tail recursion on the stack to reverse the diff elements.
Really, i don't think it is a stackoverflow as it fails at a to prominent
cmd count... I have rewritten a few
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:08:36PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Really, i don't think it is a stackoverflow as it fails at a to prominent
cmd count... I have rewritten a few parts of rred to use long and more
sane return values and it patches the file now just fine. :)
ok, excellent. but
4 matches
Mail list logo
