Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

2009-12-01 Thread Mohan R
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 Severity: minor Hi, A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page. While installing linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64, I noticed that it depends on gcc-4.1, but when I

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

2009-12-01 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 11:27:59PM +0530, Mohan R wrote: Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 Severity: minor Hi, A newcommer to Debian, forgive me if I do any mistakes, I'm trying to compile broadcom-sta following http://wiki.debian.org/wl wiki page. While installing

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

2009-12-01 Thread Mohan R
package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 severity 559069 wishlist thanks dann frazier wrote: As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still available in the distribution. It can be a wishlist bug if a package doesn't work w/ a newer compiler, but it won't be a candidate for a

Bug#559069: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64: why gcc-4.1 instead of gcc-4.3?

2009-12-01 Thread dann frazier
reassign 559069 linux-2.6 thanks On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:46:15AM +0530, Mohan R wrote: package linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 severity 559069 wishlist thanks dann frazier wrote: As far as Debian is concerned, its not a bug to use a compiler still available in the distribution. It can be a