Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-17 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Hello Torsten, Torsten Werner a écrit : > Georges Khaznadar schrieb: > > What would be the best thing to do? Fill an ITP bug? I would disagree with > > such a procedure, if it would mean rewriting the changelog from scratch, > > denying previous efforts to maintain this package. > > Feel free to

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-16 Thread Torsten Werner
Georges Khaznadar schrieb: > What would be the best thing to do? Fill an ITP bug? I would disagree with > such a procedure, if it would mean rewriting the changelog from scratch, > denying previous efforts to maintain this package. Feel free to upload the package again (but it needs NEW processin

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-16 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Hello Barry, Barry deFreese a écrit : > tags 563781 + moreinfo > > thank you > > Hi, > > I understand the need to remove this for gpsim but I would prefer that we get > some feedback from the > maintainer since he seems to have been keeping this package up to date. > > Georges, > > Are you O

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-12 Thread Barry deFreese
Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Hello Barry, > > I did not receive the bug reports first, because they were not directed > to ktechlab's maintainer (me). > > Please, can you confirm that I understood correctly the situation? This > what I understood: > > gpsim is no longer developed, and this package

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-12 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Hello Barry, I did not receive the bug reports first, because they were not directed to ktechlab's maintainer (me). Please, can you confirm that I understood correctly the situation? This what I understood: gpsim is no longer developed, and this package has two RC bugs. ktechlab depends on gpsim

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-11 Thread Barry deFreese
tags 563781 + moreinfo thank you Hi, I understand the need to remove this for gpsim but I would prefer that we get some feedback from the maintainer since he seems to have been keeping this package up to date. Georges, Are you OK with the removal of ktechlab? If not, do you have some solutio

Bug#563781: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed

2010-01-05 Thread Neil Williams
Package: ftp.debian.org Subject: RM: ktechlab -- RoQA; gpsim dependency is to be removed Severity: normal thanks It doesn't look simple to remove the need for gpsim from ktechlab, so although there isn't anything wrong with ktechlab itself, it looks like it will have to be removed. See gpsim (563