On Di, 2010-08-10 at 22:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:48:36PM -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
I had been looking at this bug for a few days now
as well the the Ubuntu Trademark Policy [1]. I am
not a legal person, so I would like to bring it to
the attention
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:48:36PM -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
I had been looking at this bug for a few days now
as well the the Ubuntu Trademark Policy [1]. I am
not a legal person, so I would like to bring it to
the attention of people who are, to see if this policy
makes the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I had been looking at this bug for a few days now
as well the the Ubuntu Trademark Policy [1]. I am
not a legal person, so I would like to bring it to
the attention of people who are, to see if this policy
makes the application non-free in its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sorry, I left out the footnote on my last email. The link to the
document covering usage of the Ubuntu trademark is here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy
- --
Jordan Metzmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
Jordan Metzmeier titan8...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I had been looking at this bug for a few days now
as well the the Ubuntu Trademark Policy [1]. I am
not a legal person, so I would like to bring it to
the attention of people who are, to see if this
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Walter Landry wrote:
This makes it clearly non-free. It is best to just replace anything
trademarked by Ubuntu.
An important caveat though, is that not every use of the word Ubuntu
is trademarkable.
So while the package in question certainly should be rebranded, it's
not
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:48:36PM -0400, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
I had been looking at this bug for a few days now
as well the the Ubuntu Trademark Policy [1]. I am
not a legal person, so I would like to bring it to
the attention of people who are, to see if this policy
makes the
7 matches
Mail list logo
