>> That should fail the build-dependency check, libutempter build-depends
>> on a newer debhelper than is in lenny.
>
> I changed the dependency in the control file, so that only the lenny
> version of debhelper was required. As the build process did not
> complain, I thought that that version was
Hello,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:36 +0200
Julien Cristau wrote:
> That should fail the build-dependency check, libutempter build-depends
> on a newer debhelper than is in lenny.
I changed the dependency in the control file, so that only the lenny
version of debhelper was required. As the build
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:47:19 +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:27:34 +0200
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > How exactly did you build the package? The packages in the archive
> > have correct permissions (on all architectures)...
>
> I built it with "dpkg-buildpackage -u
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:27:34 +0200
Julien Cristau wrote:
> How exactly did you build the package? The packages in the archive
> have correct permissions (on all architectures)...
I built it with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -rfakeroot", but with the
lenny version of debhelper. Maybe that is the r
tag 566113 unreproducible
kthxbye
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:12:37 +0100, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> I downloaded your package source and used it to create the two packages for
> lenny. After installing package libutempter0, the
> command 'ls -l /usr/lib/utempter/utempter' shows the following:
>
Package: libutempter0
Version: 1.1.5-2
Hello,
I downloaded your package source and used it to create the two packages for
lenny. After installing package libutempter0, the
command 'ls -l /usr/lib/utempter/utempter' shows the following:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4848 2010-01-19 14:08 utemp
6 matches
Mail list logo
