Bug#568601: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#568601: Bug#568601: Can confirm this problem still exists

2023-12-01 Thread Daniel Markstedt
Hi Matijs, I totally get your point and agree that this situation is not ideal. Unfortunately, I don't think the exact dependent package version is something that we as package managers can or should hard code in this fashion. Look at the "debian/control" file in the package repo:

Bug#568601: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#568601: Can confirm this problem still exists

2023-12-01 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
Hi Daniel, Indeed, I am running Debian stable on my server with just netatalk and some of its dependencies from testing, so my setup is a bit unconventional. This is in fact the case because Netatalk was dropped from Debian 12, and I didn't want to keep running the old version which has a

Bug#568601: [Pkg-netatalk-devel] Bug#568601: Can confirm this problem still exists

2023-11-30 Thread Daniel Markstedt
Hi Matijs, This is not something we can address in the netatalk package itself, since you're using an Unstable netatalk package with a Stable Debian version. (Netatalk was dropped from Debian 12 Bookworm.) See this upstream discussion for more details:

Bug#568601: Can confirm this problem still exists

2023-11-30 Thread Matijs van Zuijlen
Dear maintainer, This problem still exists. I installed netatalk from testing on a Debian server running stable, and libgcrypt was not updated at the same time because the dependency in the netatalk package specifies '>= 1.10.0', which matches the stable version 1.10.1, while testing's