I am about to upload an experimental version with Benjamin's changes.
Please open new bugs for the issues that you may have with the new version even
if they are already mentioned here.
Id love to see this merged. It looks like Benjamin Drung put an absolute
mountain of work into getting this ready to merge, and that a lot of folks
have wanted this feature over the years.
After more than 170 messages itd be a shame to just see this feature die on
the vine.
- Kodiak
On
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:36:39 +0100 Michael Prokop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Michael Prokop [Wed Jul 03, 2019 at 11:59:23AM +0200]:
> > * Benjamin Drung [Wed Apr 03, 2019 at 12:11:55PM +0200]:
>
> > > I refreshed the patches on top of version 5.3.0 and pushed it to
> > >
Hi,
* Michael Prokop [Wed Jul 03, 2019 at 11:59:23AM +0200]:
> * Benjamin Drung [Wed Apr 03, 2019 at 12:11:55PM +0200]:
> > I refreshed the patches on top of version 5.3.0 and pushed it to
> > https://salsa.debian.org/bdrung/reprepro/ and
> > https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro
> Thanks
Hi,
* Benjamin Drung [Wed Apr 03, 2019 at 12:11:55PM +0200]:
> I refreshed the patches on top of version 5.3.0 and pushed it to
> https://salsa.debian.org/bdrung/reprepro/ and
> https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro
Thanks for your efforts, Benjamin, highly appreciated.
Bernhard, is there
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2019, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> Package: reprepro
> Version: 5.3.0-1
> Followup-For: Bug #570623
>
> What is the status of this feature? The merge request is not
> available anymore
It seems that the support for pull requests were disabled.
> and the GitHub
Package: reprepro
Version: 5.3.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #570623
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey!
What is the status of this feature? The merge request is not available
anymore and the GitHub repository of the fork is not up-to-date with
5.3.0.
- -- System Information:
Debian
Hi everyone,
I rebased the patch set on top of the 5.2.0-1 release. Attached are all
71 patches as tarball. You can also pull the multiple-versions branch
from https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro
Feel free to report bugs on GitHub.
Release Notes
=
Changes between 2017-04-12 and
Hi everyone,
I found some issues with my patch set from 2017-03-29 which I have
fixed with the new patch set as of yesterday. Attached are all 65
patches as tarball. You can also pull the 5.1.1-mutiple-versions branch
from https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro
Feel free to report bugs on
On 29.03.2017 19:31, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am happy to announce the feature complete version of reprepro 5.1.1
with multiple version management. Attached are all 58 patches. You can
also pull the 5.1.1-mutiple-versions branch from
https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro
Feel
ATTENTION: I have no idea of what I'm doing
fixing update/sync:
diff --git a/upgradelist.c b/upgradelist.c
index 272b46c..8ee0de2 100644
--- a/upgradelist.c
+++ b/upgradelist.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static retvalue save_package_version(struct upgradelist
*upgrade, const char *pa
if
> Error while parsing 'asterisk-config|1:13.3.0-acos1+o0' as version: epoch in
> version is not number
I don't think that '|' character is allowed in the names by design.
But I've encountered another unrelated problem when syncing.
The conf/updates file (package name is in the
we would really like to have this. any updates?
Cool. So, I tested this by installing:
- https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/mirrorer/mirrorer.git
(git repo)
- branched off the (default) debian branch [2]
- patched with Add-multiple-version-management.patch
Exactly what I need.
Looking forward to have this patch in the package repository.
Can I help to implement this?
Joe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
What is the status of this project? It looks complete so what is needed to
have this merged?
Let me know how I can help!
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140612 17:30]:
the logging and tracking was not working in all cases when adding
packages with the include command. The fix is in the attached 0003
patch. The include and processincoming commands do work now (except when
these commands want to
Am Freitag, den 23.05.2014, 23:39 +0200 schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140521 16:48]:
I got distracted by different tasks, but now I have time to work on
reprepro again.
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2014, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
*
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140521 16:48]:
I got distracted by different tasks, but now I have time to work on
reprepro again.
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2014, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140203 13:15]:
Okay.
Hi,
I got distracted by different tasks, but now I have time to work on
reprepro again.
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2014, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140203 13:15]:
Okay. Attached the patch for my prototype. Be aware: It's just a
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140203 13:15]:
Okay. Attached the patch for my prototype. Be aware: It's just a
prototype that is just able to run the commands that I wanted to test,
but isn't near to be ready for mainlining. The prototype implements case
2 just because that
On So, 2014-02-02 at 14:06 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140108 15:51]:
First sorry for my late reply. I must have totally missed your mail.
No problem. I have been kept busy with other projects. ;)
The first step is to agree on the
* Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@profitbricks.com [140108 15:51]:
First sorry for my late reply. I must have totally missed your mail.
The first step is to agree on the database layout change. I came up with
two alternatives:
1) Allow duplicate entries in packages.db and sort duplicate
Hi,
I am in the process of making reprepro support multiple packages per
distribution/architecture/component/type quadruple. This requires bigger
changes in the database layout and all internal logic. I have a working
prototype (for including binary packages). I plan to extent this patch
to get
Package: reprepro
Version: 4.0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Currently, indices built by reprepro only show the latest version of
a package. I really would like to use reprepro to have an archive
with multiple versions of a package accessible (eg for rollback).
currently I do something like that after
* Jean-Christophe Dubacq jcduba...@free.fr [100220 11:14]:
Currently, indices built by reprepro only show the latest version of
a package. I really would like to use reprepro to have an archive
with multiple versions of a package accessible (eg for rollback).
Sorry, that is not coming soon.
26 matches
Mail list logo
