On Mon, Mar 29 2010, Jakub Wilk wrote:
- the binary packages uses obsolete (pre-0.90) python-support
directory layout.
Can you point me to the documentation that shows the new
python-support directory layout? I seem to have missed the migration.
There is a cursory description of
* Manoj Srivastava sriva...@acm.org, 2010-03-28, 16:10:
The attached patch fixes this bug. However, there are more things in
the package that needs attention:
- *.pyc and *.pyo files are shipped in the binary package;
That should be simple enough to fix.
- the binary packages uses
On Tue, Mar 02 2010, Jakub Wilk wrote:
The attached patch fixes this bug. However, there are more things in
the package that needs attention:
- *.pyc and *.pyo files are shipped in the binary package;
That should be simple enough to fix.
- the binary packages uses obsolete
tags 571554 + patch
thanks
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2010-02-26, 00:26:
| checking for python... /usr/bin/python
| checking for python version... 2.6
| checking for python platform... linux2
| checking for python script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.6/dist-packages
| checking for
Source: setools
Version: 3.3.6.ds-6
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6
Hello,
When rebuilt in an environment with Python 2.6 as the default version,
your package failed to build from source. Here are the relevant parts of
the build log:
| checking
5 matches
Mail list logo
