Bug#576640: qmail: General update after the debconf review process

2010-06-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
 Dear Debian maintainer,
 
 On Sunday, March 21, 2010, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a 
 review
 action on debconf templates for qmail.
 
 Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing
 the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translation
 updates.
 
 Translators have been working hard and here is now the result of their 
 efforts.
 
 Please consider using it EVEN if you committed files to your
 development tree as long as they were reported.


Ping. This review process happened about 3 months ago. Would it be
possible to consider an upload with these changes applied?

I begin to think about one of my usual l10n NMU but wanted to first
discuss with package maintainer(s) in case something else is holding
off a new upload.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#576640: qmail: General update after the debconf review process

2010-04-28 Thread Christian PERRIER
Dear Debian maintainer,

On Sunday, March 21, 2010, I sent you a notification about the beginning of a 
review
action on debconf templates for qmail.

Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing
the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translation
updates.

Translators have been working hard and here is now the result of their efforts.

Please consider using it EVEN if you committed files to your
development tree as long as they were reported.

The attached tarball contains:

- debian/changelog with the list of changes
- debian/control with rewrites of packages' descriptions
- debian/templates with all the rewritten templates file(s)
- debian/po/*.po with all PO files (existing ones and new ones)

As said, please use *at least* the PO files as provided here,
preferrably over those sent by translators in their bug reports. All
of them have been checked and reformatted. In some cases, formatting
errors have been corrected.

The patch.rfr file contains a patch for the templates and control
file(s) alone.

Please note that this patch applies to the templates and control
file(s) of your package as of Sunday, March 21, 2010. If your package was 
updated
in the meantime, I may have updated my reference copybut I also
may have missed that. This is indeed why I suggested you do not
modified such files while the review process was running,
remember..:-)

It is now safe to upload a new package version with these changes.

Please notify me of your intents with regards to this. 

There is of course no hurry to update your package but feel free to
contact me in case you would need sponsoring or any other action to
fix this.



-- 





patch.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
--- qmail.old/debian/qmail.templates2010-03-17 11:37:14.178507203 +0100
+++ qmail/debian/qmail.templates2010-04-10 14:50:29.556287282 +0200
@@ -1,69 +1,86 @@
+# These templates have been reviewed by the debian-l10n-english
+# team
+#
+# If modifications/additions/rewording are needed, please ask
+# debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org for advice.
+#
+# Even minor modifications require translation updates and such
+# changes should be coordinated with translators and reviewers.
+
 Template: qmail/readme
 Type: note
-_Description: README
- Before making any changes to your qmail configuration, please read
- /usr/share/doc/qmail/README.Debian.gz.  This contains a description of the 
- differences bewtween other mailers on Debian, qmail on Debian, and qmail on 
- other systems.
- .
- If you were using sendmail (or smail) previously, you will also want to read
- the qmail-upgrade manpage, which details user-visible differences between
- sendmail and qmail.
+_Description: Notice for Qmail users
+ Before making any changes to Qmail configuration, please read
+ /usr/share/doc/qmail/README.Debian.gz. This file includes a
+ description of the differences between Qmail in Debian, Qmail in
+ other systems, and other mail transfer agents.
+ .
+ If you were using a more conventional MTA previously, you will also want
+ to read the qmail-upgrade manpage, which details user-visible
+ differences between Sendmail and Qmail.
  .
- If you are new to qmail, you will want to at least peruse the qmail FAQ, which
- can be found in /usr/doc/qmail
+ If you are new to Qmail, you will want to at least peruse the Qmail FAQ, which
+ can be found in /usr/share/doc/qmail.
 
 Template: qmail/start
-Type: select
-_Choices: yes, no
-_Description: Do you want to start qmail now?
+Type: boolean
+_Description: Start Qmail now?
 
 Template: qmail/reboot
 Type: note
 _Description: Qmail will be started at the next reboot
- Or you can start qmail manually when
- you are ready by typing (as root) /etc/init.d/qmail start at a shell prompt.
+ You chose not to start Qmail now. It will be started
+ automatically at next reboot.
+ .
+ You can also start it manually with /etc/init.d/qmail start
+ (as root) at a shell prompt.
 
 Template: qmail/userpurge
-Type: select
-_Choices: yes, no
-_Description: Remove qmail users during a purge?
+Type: boolean
+_Description: Remove Qmail users during a purge?
+ Please choose whether you want users created by the qmail package
+ to be removed when this package is purged.
 
 Template: qmail/recipientmap
-Type: note
-_Description: WARNING
- recipientmap is gone from qmail-1.03. The virtualdomains mechanism
- has been expanded to support virtual users.  You will need to fix your setup.
+Type: error
+_Description: Changes for virtual users
+ recipientmap is gone from Qmail 1.03. The virtualdomains mechanism
+ has been expanded to support virtual users. This machine's setup
+ needs to be fixed.
 
 Template: qmail/qlist
 Type: note
-_Description: WARNING
- qlist has been split into a separate package by Dan Bernstein (the
- author of qmail) since qmail-1.02.
- .
- qlist has not been packaged because ezmlm does a better job,
- but if you still want qlist, you can either get it direct from
-