@Martin-Éric : the upstream author would like more details on the
upstream bugtracker, can you chime in there?
https://cups.org/str.php?L4333
TIA, cheers,
OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2014/1/13 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org:
@Martin-Éric : the upstream author would like more details on the
upstream bugtracker, can you chime in there?
https://cups.org/str.php?L4333
I'm really unsure of what to respond about the request for a cups.conf
that produces this issue
Le vendredi, 10 janvier 2014, 17.15:52 Holger Levsen a écrit :
then, fix the error message and then close the bug?
Well, I will not change an upstream-internationalized error (translated
in 7 languages) in a Debian patch. But I reported this problem in the
upstream bugtracker:
Hi Till,
Can you give your input here? I seem to remember some discussions about
CUPS-PDF…
Le vendredi, 10 janvier 2014, 17.55:29 Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
2014/1/10 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org:
While hunting down old src:cups bugs, I stumbled upon #578079, which
I think is
control: tags -1 - moreinfo
control: tags -1 + upstrean
Hi,
On Samstag, 11. Januar 2014, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Well, I will not change an upstream-internationalized error (translated
in 7 languages) in a Debian patch. But I reported this problem in the
upstream bugtracker:
For lpadmin commands it depends where -E is specified. -E before -p
enforces encryption, but -E after -p directly enables the queue.
So you have to take care that the command line arguments of lpadmin are
in the right order in the maintainer scripts.
We do not want to enforce encryption as it is
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi all,
While hunting down old src:cups bugs, I stumbled upon #578079, which I
think is not-a-bug, see below.
Le jeudi, 28 avril 2011, 15.56:06 Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
I'm starting to suspect that upstream made some backward-incompatible
changes to the way
2014/1/10 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org:
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi all,
While hunting down old src:cups bugs, I stumbled upon #578079, which I
think is not-a-bug, see below.
Le jeudi, 28 avril 2011, 15.56:06 Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
I'm starting to suspect that upstream
Hi Didier,
On Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
I therefore propose to close this bug as it doesn't appear (to me) to be
a bug but mostly a miscomprehension of the error message.
ah
Opinions?
then, fix the error message and then close the bug?
cheers,
Holger
2011/4/28 Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org:
Hi Tom,
did you find a solution for this bug? I see it on one squeeze system, while
not on another. Both print to a cups server running squeeze.
lpq and lpc status both show the queues nicely to me, yet lpr fails as you
described: lpr: Upgrade
10 matches
Mail list logo
