Am 29.05.2010 13:59, schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee:
My only point was that evolution-exchange should not be a hard
dependency for Evolution, since it isn't.
It isn't in Debian, either. The evolution package does merely suggest
the evolution-exchange package, so it is perfectly possible to install
Op zaterdag 29-05-2010 om 15:25 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Emilio
Pozuelo Monfort:
On 29/05/10 13:59, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
My only point was that evolution-exchange should not be a hard
dependency for Evolution, since it isn't.
Right, it isn't:
Package: evolution
[...]
Suggests:
On 29/05/10 13:59, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
My only point was that evolution-exchange should not be a hard
dependency for Evolution, since it isn't.
Right, it isn't:
Package: evolution
[...]
Suggests: bug-buddy, gnupg, network-manager, evolution-exchange, evolution-dbg,
Op vrijdag 28-05-2010 om 11:08 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Josselin
Mouette:
Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 à 09:09 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
Currently the gnome metapackage depends on evolution-exchange |
evolution-mapi. My favourite desktop environment does not depend on
connectors
Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 à 09:09 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit :
Currently the gnome metapackage depends on evolution-exchange |
evolution-mapi. My favourite desktop environment does not depend on
connectors for proprietary products and protocols,
Yes, it does. At least since 2.13, see:
Am 28.05.2010 11:08, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
And to be more precise, we include a lot of connectors for proprietary
stuff: for CIFS mounts, for NTFS disks, for iPods, for youtube…
And to be even more precise, the firmware codes in your BIOS, CPU,
north and south bridge, network and graphics
Package: meta-gnome2
Currently the gnome metapackage depends on evolution-exchange |
evolution-mapi. My favourite desktop environment does not depend on
connectors for proprietary products and protocols, so this should not be
depended upon (at most recommended or even suggested).
I also think it
7 matches
Mail list logo
