Le Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski a écrit : > ["Steffen Möller", 2010-07-10] > > > PPS binary package name should be python-vision > > > > No, it should either be vision or mgltools-vision. I know about the > > policy, but it does not fit here since the vision pakckage is truly > > for end users, not some library, and they don't care how it is > > implemented. > > Can you at least provide python-vision?
Hi Piotr and Steffen, that is a good idea. It totally reminds a discussion on the debian-perl mailing list, where the conclusion was that in the next update of bioperl, I will make the package provide libbio-perl-perl. These predictable names, while not familiar to the end users of the packages, are helpful to the developers who do distribution-wide works. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
