Will Thompson wrote:
On 28/06/10 11:50, Chris Lamb wrote:
Fancy refreshing the package a little for GHC 6.12 and doing another
release? :)
Done:
http://www.willthompson.co.uk/bustle/releases/bustle-0.2.2.tar.gz and
http://www.willthompson.co.uk/bustle/releases/bustle-0.2.2.tar.gz.asc
I
On 30/06/10 10:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
I think this tarball is missing the Bustle/ directory.. :)
Blah. I wish cabal had a distcheck-alike.
New tarball uploaded.
--
Will
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 28/06/10 11:50, Chris Lamb wrote:
Fancy refreshing the package a little for GHC 6.12 and doing another
release? :)
Done: http://www.willthompson.co.uk/bustle/releases/bustle-0.2.2.tar.gz
and http://www.willthompson.co.uk/bustle/releases/bustle-0.2.2.tar.gz.asc
--
Will
--
To
tags 587132 + upstream
thanks
Hi Will,
Looks like libghc6-pango-dev doesn't provide Graphics.UI.Gtk.Pango.Font,
it's renamed to Graphics.Rendering.Pango.Layout.
However, simply adjusting the import lines (and adding pango to cabal
Build-Depends) doesn't work:
* Bustle.hs:237:14:
Ambiguous
Hi,
On 28/06/10 11:50, Chris Lamb wrote:
Looks like libghc6-pango-dev doesn't provide Graphics.UI.Gtk.Pango.Font,
it's renamed to Graphics.Rendering.Pango.Layout.
Sigh. Well I guess that's more correct, but it's a bit of a pain from a
backwards-compatibility perspective. I can probably just
Source: bustle
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100624 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
6 matches
Mail list logo
