On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:20 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org, 2011-01-09, 19:01:
Seems to be a undeclared conflict against python-pysnmp2
I believe that python-pysnmp{2,4} was designed to be co-installable,
just something didn't work out. Part of the problem
owner 591503 !
thanks
* Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk, 2011-01-11, 20:56:
Seems to be a undeclared conflict against python-pysnmp2
I believe that python-pysnmp{2,4} was designed to be co-installable,
just something didn't work out. Part of the problem is that one of them
was built
severity 591503 grave
kthxbye
Seems to be a undeclared conflict against python-pysnmp2
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
* Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org, 2011-01-09, 19:01:
Seems to be a undeclared conflict against python-pysnmp2
I believe that python-pysnmp{2,4} was designed to be co-installable,
just something didn't work out. Part of the problem is that one of them
was built with python-support 0.90
4 matches
Mail list logo
