Bug#592244: [Pkg-varnish-devel] Bug#592244: libvcl.so existing in both packages

2010-08-27 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org writes: There was recently a discussion on debian-de...@l.d.o[1] concerning a similar case (bug #592242): Simply using conflicts is nont policy conform and should be avoided. I've spoken with my upstream, and was told that the only public API was in

Bug#592244: libvcl.so existing in both packages

2010-08-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:44:29PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: I suggest we add Conflicts: headers for varnish-dev and libvxl1-dev against each other, as I do not like the idea of renaming any of the libraries. There was recently a discussion on debian-de...@l.d.o[1] concerning a

Bug#592244: libvcl.so existing in both packages

2010-08-22 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Hello, /usr/lib/libvcl.so exists in both packages. They do not provide the same functionality, so Replaces: would probably not be proper. I suggest we add Conflicts: headers for varnish-dev and libvxl1-dev against each other, as I do not like the idea of renaming any of the libraries. --