You are saying that latex generates invalid DVI files.
Unless you point me to any place in latex or in dvi documentation that would
support your claim, dated latest by last month, I would not even think of that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Le mercredi 18 août 2010 à 05:51 -0400, sasha mal a écrit :
You are saying that latex generates invalid DVI files.
No, I am suggesting that PStricks does.
Which is the whole point of PStricks, after all.
Unless you point me to any place in latex or in dvi documentation that
would support
Don't pretend you don't understand.
Evince is an all-document viewer. It should render all valid files.
The argumentation for the xdvi maintainer is faulty. If you want to discuss
that too, discuss in the bug report related to xdvi, not here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le mardi 17 août 2010 à 11:49 -0400, sasha mal a écrit :
Don't pretend you don't understand.
Evince is an all-document viewer. It should render all valid files.
Good that you understand that. Then I am sorry to inform you that DVI
files that use PStricks are not valid ones.
kthxbye,
--
Package: evince
Version: 2.30.3-1
The following code is rendered correct in gv or evince when run on the ps file,
but incorrect in evince when run on the dvi file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pst-all}
\begin{document}
\begin{pspicture}(0,0)(4,4)
\rput(1,1){\rnode{F}{F}}
5 matches
Mail list logo
