On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:32:57PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:39:32PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > > Why is this a problem?
> > > >
> > > > The fact that boost_filesystem depends upon boost_sy
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:24:15AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:39:32PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > > Why is this a problem?
> > >
> > > The fact that boost_filesystem depends upon boost_system is an
> > > internal implementation detail that is exposed in the publi
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:39:32PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Why is this a problem?
> >
> > The fact that boost_filesystem depends upon boost_system is an
> > internal implementation detail that is exposed in the public headers--
> > I'm not making direct use of it myself.
>
> Let me see
> Why is this a problem?
>
> The fact that boost_filesystem depends upon boost_system is an
> internal implementation detail that is exposed in the public headers--
> I'm not making direct use of it myself.
Let me see if I can paraphrase this.
1. Library A depends on Library B for some implement
4 matches
Mail list logo