2010/9/14 Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de:
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
[ insert my ButAutomaticUpgrades bla bla here]
Wouldn't it make more sense to have
DefaultPin: 100
Or do you want to invent a new tag for every pin value that might be
usefull for an
tag 596097 patch
thanks
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 15:25 +0200]:
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
If we (or rather the backport.debian.org ftpmasters, I'm just trying to
convince you to provide the apt feature that is a prerequisite for
David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com writes:
tag 596097 patch
thanks
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 15:25 +0200]:
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
If we (or rather the backport.debian.org ftpmasters, I'm just trying to
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 10:42 +0200]:
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
for backports.debian.org we use the NotAutomatic Flag to prevent
users from installing every backport. Unfortunatly that has the
drawback of preventing updates from installed backports. Even if our
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 10:42 +0200]:
2010/9/8 Alexander Wirt formo...@debian.org:
Beside that you will shock each lenny to squeeze changer which doesn't
read the news… or does make an upgrade with apt/lenny which doesn't
understand the new
* David Kalnischkies [2010-09-09 15:25 +0200]:
2010/9/9 Carsten Hey cars...@debian.org:
.. NotAutomatic could still be set and overruled by the new flag, even
if it feels a bit ugly to do so…
Indeed, that seems to be a good solution for this.
Five years ago, when I mentioned DefaultPriority
6 matches
Mail list logo
