Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-12-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-11-25, 20:35: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH= $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/foobar${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} $ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /foobar: LD_LIBRARY_PATH can be unset naturally, ie without the user knowing. It is actually the default. However, if it

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-11-25 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:11:47PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3 thanks * Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44: It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of $TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because : - if

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-11-25 Thread Etienne Millon
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:11:47PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3 thanks * Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44: It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-11-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3 thanks * Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44: It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of $TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because : - if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is empty before, the ${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+...} constructs

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-10-20 Thread Etienne Millon
Hello, Does the following sentence relate to my question? I believe that the second warning can be safely ignored. It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of $TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because : - if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is empty before, the

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-10-20 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi all, sorry for delay. On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:51:07 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote: Here is a patch that fixes this issue. I believe that the second warning can be safely ignored. I'm preparing a fixed package but I've a question which I' like to solve before upload it. A patch of Etienne

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-10-20 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi Etienne, On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:44:56 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote: Does the following sentence relate to my question? I believe that the second warning can be safely ignored. It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of $TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done,

Bug#598424: Patch for CVE-2010-3394

2010-10-15 Thread Etienne Millon
tags 598424 patch thanks Dear maintainer, Here is a patch that fixes this issue. I believe that the second warning can be safely ignored. Regards, -- Etienne Millon diff -u texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog --- texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog +++