Hello,
Am 25.09.2011 um 20:23 Uhr schrieb Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk:
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 15:09 +0200, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
I can confirm that there are problems with the clock in PV domUs.
[..]
I'm wondering if I can set the former behavior of the domU clock to use
the
Hello,
I can confirm that there are problems with the clock in PV domUs.
I've setups like as follows:
* Debian lenny dom0s running Debian squeeze and Debian lenny domUs (PV)
* Debian squeeze doms running Debian squeeze and Debian lenny domUs (PV)
I only have clock/time problems with my squeeze
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 15:09 +0200, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
Hello,
I can confirm that there are problems with the clock in PV domUs.
I've setups like as follows:
* Debian lenny dom0s running Debian squeeze and Debian lenny domUs (PV)
* Debian squeeze doms running Debian squeeze and
Hello,
I am got this issue on several (10+) Xen 4.0 servers without HVM:
linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-29~bpo50+1 Linux
2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 suppor
xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd644.0.1-1The
Xen Hypervisor on AMD64
Each
Hi,
No, unfortunately not. I just suffered it again aswell over the
Christmas break. Let me know if you find any fix.
Regards,
Mark
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:50:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:05:18PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
As this is when the clock
In addition, I received the below from James Song but when I queried
what it changed he did not respond, so I haven't tried it..
added timer_mode =2 and tsc_mode = 1 and viridian=1 into your
configure file.
On Tue, Jan
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:05:18PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
As this is when the clock went from 18:00 to 18:50 and started the chain
of events (restarted the 2008 domU). Any ideas why this log occurred?
The TSC appeared to go backwards by a fairly significant amount, which
has upset
Hi Ben, Thanks for your response. See my responses inline.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:35:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:31 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-21
Severity: important
Hi, Did you receive
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:33 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Hi Ben, Thanks for your response. See my responses inline.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:35:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:31 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 11:47:05AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:33 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Hi Ben, Thanks for your response. See my responses inline.
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:35:23AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:31 +0100, Mark Adams
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-21
Severity: important
Hi, Did you receive this bug report? I hadn't received a bug ID even
though receiving the copy of the original report. Likely because the
address it was sent from originally was invalid.
-
Hi
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:31 +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
Package: xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-21
Severity: important
Hi, Did you receive this bug report? I hadn't received a bug ID even
though receiving the copy of the original report.
We don't have any other bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
