[Ce message a aussi été publié sur gmane.test.]
On 19-10-2010, Sylvain Le Gall gil...@debian.org wrote:
Try to cc the bug as well as the mailing list (for the record).
On 17-10-2010, Sylvain Le Gall gil...@debian.org wrote:
On 16-10-2010, Guillaume Yziquel guillaume.yziq...@citycable.ch wrote:
Le 17/10/2010 00:53, Guillaume Yziquel a écrit :
I register an OCaml array with caml_register_generational_global_root.
The array contains functions. The C++ code takes an offset in this array
and calls the function, typically with caml_callback3.
[...]
But it works fine in native code, so
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.12.0-1~38
Severity: normal
I'm currently having issues with C++ callbacks to OCaml, and digging into
the callbacks.c file, I discovered that OCaml in Debian is not built
with the LOCAL_CALLBACK_BYTECODE macro enabled.
It seems to me that the current situation might be
Le 16/10/2010 23:24, Guillaume Yziquel a écrit :
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.12.0-1~38
Severity: normal
Does this apply to 3.10.2 as well?
I'm currently having issues with C++ callbacks to OCaml, [...]
Could you be more precise?
[...] and digging into
the callbacks.c file, I discovered
Le Sunday 17 Oct 2010 à 00:10:41 (+0200), Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Le 16/10/2010 23:24, Guillaume Yziquel a écrit :
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.12.0-1~38
Severity: normal
Does this apply to 3.10.2 as well?
I guess so, but I haven't checked with 3.10.2.
I'm currently having issues with
Le Sunday 17 Oct 2010 à 00:53:29 (+0200), Guillaume Yziquel a écrit :
I'm currently having issues with C++ callbacks to OCaml, [...]
Could you be more precise?
For the follow-up, an explanation of my segfault and why it happens
(indirection mismatch, and probably weak API for callbacks
6 matches
Mail list logo
