Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-23 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi,

* PJ Weisberg pjweisb...@gmail.com [2010-11-23 06:06:37 CET]:
 There was a 1.9.1-1 when I made the earlier report.  I've since
 upgraded to 1.9.2-1.  In order to do so, I had to install
 wesnoth-1.8-core.  :-)

 Right - just stating that it won't be needed for the next upgrade
because I fixed it in my codebase. :)

 (I didn't upgrade immediately because I was in the middle of a
 campaign and other games have trained me not to upgrade when I still
 care about my save files.)

 Good choice, especially for the development release. There is no
guarantee in that branch that savegames will stay compatible (or client
versions in multiplayer games). If you want something stable to stick
with, 1.8 is the way to go.

 Enjoy!
Rhonda
-- 
dholbach Last day of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek starting in
   34 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom on irc.feenode.net
 * ScottK hands dholbach an r.
Rhonda Are they fundraising again?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-22 Thread PJ Weisberg
There was a 1.9.1-1 when I made the earlier report.  I've since
upgraded to 1.9.2-1.  In order to do so, I had to install
wesnoth-1.8-core.  :-)

(I didn't upgrade immediately because I was in the middle of a
campaign and other games have trained me not to upgrade when I still
care about my save files.)

-- 

-PJ



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-20 Thread PJ Weisberg
Actually, drop #3 from that workaround.  Upgrading wesnoth-1.9-core *also*
requires wesnoth-1.8-core to be installed.  :-/


Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* PJ Weisberg pjweisb...@gmail.com [2010-11-20 11:59:13 CET]:
 Actually, drop #3 from that workaround.  Upgrading wesnoth-1.9-core *also*
 requires wesnoth-1.8-core to be installed.  :-/

 Upgrading from what to what? Actually, no, it won't. That's why this
bugreport is marked as pending, the fix has been applied to the VCS.

 Thanks,
Rhonda
-- 
dholbach Last day of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek starting in
   34 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom on irc.feenode.net
 * ScottK hands dholbach an r.
Rhonda Are they fundraising again?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-20 Thread PJ Weisberg
From 1:1.9.1-1 to 1:1.9.2-1.


Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* PJ Weisberg pjweisb...@gmail.com [2010-11-20 23:10:17 CET]:
 From 1:1.9.1-1 to 1:1.9.2-1.

 There is no 1:1.9.1-1 anymore since a while already in the pool.
Rhonda



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-03 Thread PJ Weisberg
Package: wesnoth-1.9
Version: 1:1.9.1-1
Severity: normal

Yes, I was very suspicious when I opened up the postinst script to try to
figure out why it failed.  It says if [ $? != 0 ]; then in a couple of
places, but $? can NEVER be != to 0, because the 'set -e' at the top would
cause the script to die immediately if that happened.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages wesnoth-1.9 depends on:
pn  wesnoth-1.9-aoi   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-core  none (no description available)
ii  wesnoth-1.9-data  1:1.9.1-1  data files for Wesnoth (branch 1.9
pn  wesnoth-1.9-did   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-dmnone (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-dwnone (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-einone (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-httt  none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-l none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-low   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-nrnone (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-sof   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-sotbe none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-thot  none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-trow  none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-tsg   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-ttb   none (no description available)
pn  wesnoth-1.9-utbs  none (no description available)

Versions of packages wesnoth-1.9 recommends:
ii  wesnoth-1.9-music 1:1.9.1-1  music files for Wesnoth (branch 1.

wesnoth-1.9 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-03 Thread PJ Weisberg
As a temporary workaround, until the postinst script gets fixed, you can:

1. Install wesnoth-1.8-core
2. Install wesnoth-1.9-core
3. Uninstall wesnoth-1.8-core

The  Wesnoth1.9 postinst configuration script is set up to abort if
Wesnoth isn't already configured, so installing a version that does
successfully configure tricks it into working.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org