On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
1:9.7.2.dfsg.P3-1 unblocked.
Thanks - the specific patch for the first CVE was not forthcoming. And
the others just combined to make it more sensible to just unblock it, IMO.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 06:11:40PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:50:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752.
2010-37*6*2 :-)
Any questions why a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Lamont, would it be possible to prepare an upload fixing just the
security bug for squeeze (so based on 1:9.7.1.dfsg.P2-2)?
I looked into it a bit, but couldn't pinpoint the exact changes for
CVE-2010-3752 (not with a
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 19:50:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752.
2010-37*6*2 :-)
Any questions why a new upstream version was uploaded need to be
directed to Lamont :-)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752.
Any questions why a new upstream version was uploaded need to be
directed to Lamont :-)
unblock bind9/1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1
-- System
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:52 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package bind9. It fixes CVE-2010-3752.
2010-37*6*2 :-)
Any questions why a new upstream version was uploaded need to be
directed to Lamont :-)
Not just a new upstream, but one including SONAME changes (thankfully
not
6 matches
Mail list logo
