Package: src:openvswitch
Version: 1.1.0~pre2-2
Severity: serious
Your package FTBFS on all architectures [0]. Here is a snippet from
i386[1]:
|struct alignment checker unit tests
|
| 19: check struct tail padding ok
| 20: check struct internal alignment ok
|
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Your package FTBFS on all architectures [0]. Here is a snippet from
i386[1]:
|daemon unit tests - C
|
| 22: daemon FAILED (daemon.at:11)
| 23: daemon --monitor
* Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 09:48:28 [-0800]:
These tests don't fail for me when I run them locally or on a Debian
machine (e.g. paganini.debian.org). The testsuite produces more
information for failed tests, in
_debian/tests/testsuite.dir/testnum/testsuite.log inside the top
source directory. Is
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
and got the same error message. On buildds it hang in the perl test case
but here it continued. I just
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
and got the same error message. On buildds
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:30:17PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 13:21:59 [-0800]:
Thanks for the hint. I was able to reproduce the problem locally with
sbuild. I'm sure that I can track it down now.
You got the part where I blamed sun_path for beeing
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
I just built via
| sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
|
reassign 602891 src:openvswitch
thanks
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:39:06PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
This isn't an sbuild issue, and we can't reliably work around it in
sbuild either, for the reasons stated above.
Thank you.
I agree, I'm reassigning it back to openvswitch (with this email).
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:54:25PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
- we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
we can't make any guarantees even than since package names
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
- we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
we can't make any guarantees even than since package names and
version numbers don't have any fixed limit. You still
10 matches
Mail list logo
