Bug#606712: can't deal with _ in domain names

2010-12-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 12 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: But as one can now even have Chinese URLs, perhaps the _ could be allowed. IDN URLs are encoded in such a way as to be legal, i.e. no _ or other forbidden bytes, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#606712: can't deal with _ in domain names

2010-12-12 Thread jidanni
PS == Paul Slootman p...@debian.org writes: PS IDN URLs are encoded in such a way as to be legal, i.e. no _ or other PS forbidden bytes, i know, punycode. Maybe Andrew could let a few extra wetback characters through, if it won't break anything(?)... perhaps optionally via the .conf file. --

Bug#606712: can't deal with _ in domain names

2010-12-11 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sat 11 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: I don't know if _ in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly They're not. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#606712: can't deal with _ in domain names

2010-12-11 Thread jidanni
PS == Paul Slootman p...@debian.org writes: PS On Sat 11 Dec 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: I don't know if _ in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly PS They're not. Perhaps an error message could say so, instead of truncating it and trying to get w. But as one can now even

Bug#606712: can't deal with _ in domain names

2010-12-10 Thread jidanni
X-debbugs-Cc: a...@gedanken.demon.co.uk, wwwoffle-us...@gedanken.demon.co.uk Package: wwwoffle Version: 2.9f-2.2 I don't know if _ in domain names are legal or not, but the perfectly good website http://w_awakening.womenweb.org.tw/ as mentioned on