Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-23 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:09:50 -0400 (EDT), Jonathan Nieder wrote: If you run git log dd30ac3 --grep='dasd: correct device table', then the fix will show up: commit 5da24b7627ff821e154a3aaecd5d60e1d8e228a5 Author: Stefan Haberland stefan.haberl...@de.ibm.com Date: Thu Feb 17 13:13:55

Bug#607416: Bug #607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-22 Thread Stephen Powell
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:05:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: You know sta...@kernel.org? Use it. Yes, I contacted sta...@kernel.org regarding bug number 550898. But this situation is a little bit different. With 550898, IBM wrote a single git commit to fix a single bug. Asking for that commit

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-22 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Stephen, Stephen Powell wrote: commit f85cca6b25971a09efbe4c6a3ae405d40c8f86da Merge: 6f576d5 dd30ac3 Author: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org Date: Mon Feb 21 14:55:49 2011 -0800 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git390.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-14 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:34:15PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: I can confirm that the problem reported in this bug report has been fixed in linux-source-2.6.38 version 2.6.38-3 (and in binaries derived from that source). Perhaps it was fixed in earlier versions as well; but this is the first

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-04-13 Thread Stephen Powell
I can confirm that the problem reported in this bug report has been fixed in linux-source-2.6.38 version 2.6.38-3 (and in binaries derived from that source). Perhaps it was fixed in earlier versions as well; but this is the first version I have tried in which it works. /sbin/modinfo

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-02-15 Thread Stefan Haberland
Begin forwarded message: Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:10:07 -0500 (EST) From: Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com To: Christian Borntraeger borntrae...@de.ibm.com Cc: 607...@bugs.debian.org, linux-s...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2011-02-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:43:45 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: Stephen, thanks for your report. I forwarded your report to our DASD developers to handle the report. Christian PS: For bug reports or patches you can also include linux-s...@vger.kernel.org most of our developers are

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2010-12-23 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:59:00 -0500 (EST), Stephen Powell wrote: This is a bug report for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c in the Linux kernel source code. The device table indicates that a combination of a 3880 storage control unit and a 3390 DASD device type is valid. This is incorrect. A

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380

2010-12-18 Thread Stephen Powell
Hello upstream, This is a bug report for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c in the Linux kernel source code. The device table indicates that a combination of a 3880 storage control unit and a 3390 DASD device type is valid. This is incorrect. A 3880 storage control unit cannot support a 3390

Bug#607416: Device table incorrect for drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c: 3880/3390 should be 3880/3380. (s390/s390x only)

2010-12-17 Thread Stephen Powell
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-29 The device table in drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c which indicates which storage control unit and dasd device type combinations are supported by the driver is incorrect. The device table indicates that a combination of 3880 for a control unit and 3390 for a