Hi,
shouldn't the do_upgrade method use dist-upgrade too then?
I guess it would be at least nice to have the option to run dist-upgrade
instead of (safe-)upgrade in the frontend.
- stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Am 29.01.2011 18:07, schrieb Stefan Bühler:
Hi,
shouldn't the do_upgrade method use dist-upgrade too then?
I guess it would be at least nice to have the option to run dist-upgrade
instead of (safe-)upgrade in the frontend.
I already thought about that, but I think (with assumeyes) that it
Hi,
On 01/29/2011 06:26 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 29.01.2011 18:07, schrieb Stefan Bühler:
Hi,
shouldn't the do_upgrade method use dist-upgrade too then?
I guess it would be at least nice to have the option to run dist-upgrade
instead of (safe-)upgrade in the frontend.
I already
Package: apt-dater-host
Version: 0.8.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
this bug is related to SF Bug#3158198 reported by Mathieu PARENT:
apt-dater-host does silently ignore any ABI-incompatible updates (like bind9).
Users of apt-dater might think that their hosts are up to date
severity #611088 critical
thanks
Indeed, this is critical
Am 25.01.2011 15:10, schrieb Thomas Liske:
Package: apt-dater-host
Version: 0.8.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
this bug is related to SF Bug#3158198 reported by Mathieu PARENT:
apt-dater-host does silently
5 matches
Mail list logo