Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:23:15AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
Please let us know what is your preferred approach.
Please, do the same as already done for
http://www.debian.org/ports/mips/
http://www.debian.org/ports/mipsel/
I.e. 301 Moved Permanently
english/ports/Makefile to add a link from kfreebsd-{amd64,i386} to kfreebsd-gnu
Note the method we use by the past to handle such cases was symbolic link
(leading to 200 OK), because we didn't have control on all webmirrors.
Now webmirrors are under DSA control, we are able to ask DSA for a change in
apache configuration.
*Not* closing the bug since the choice between the 2 methods still has to be
discussed.
Regards.
--
Simon Paillard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
Is it possible to have 301 redirects from the missing pages to the correct one ? That addition would make the intended sharing obvious. 2011/2/7, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org: David Prévot, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 23:50:26 -0400, a écrit : Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit : On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ We link according to the arch name. Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch name from port website name. Hi kFreeBSD team, We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.) but this choice is up to you. If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. The installation guide already correctly generates the links. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110207112242.ga9...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr -- Envoyé avec mon mobile -- Steve Schnepp http://blog.pwkf.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
Please let us know what is your preferred approach. Please, do the same as already done for http://www.debian.org/ports/mips/ http://www.debian.org/ports/mipsel/ I.e. 301 Moved Permanently Thanks Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
David Prévot, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 23:50:26 -0400, a écrit : Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit : On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ We link according to the arch name. Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch name from port website name. Hi kFreeBSD team, We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.) but this choice is up to you. If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. The installation guide already correctly generates the links. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 05/02/2011 22:39, Samuel Thibault a écrit : Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit : On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ We link according to the arch name. Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch name from port website name. Hi kFreeBSD team, We are wondering if the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 would deserve their own http://www.debian.org/ports/ pages. It may be the more consistent approach regarding existing directory name (alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, etc.) but this choice is up to you. If there is no point in maintaining both the ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and ports/kfreebsd-i386 pages, we could try to tweak the auto-generated links about kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 to actually point to ports/kfreebsd-gnu, but since those links maybe automatically generated in other documents like release-notes or installation-guide, we may also need to prepare a 301 redirection from ports/kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. Please let us know what is your preferred approach. Regards David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNT2wAAAoJELgqIXr9/gnyrUEP/ReFM0BIeQSQ+O/xDsN0kZN4 MWvSa5aLPuB3mfxFpUMzuZe+HtOSSBj5yMB1m7g2QgYGJm2mDJVCsd4vF3wA9F8n 50pGBy1KjGjw/4I6H1r0h71NBn4O9HPMWXGBDVNPuTb3Jxq329YjTeiB4KMW0LGy oKG1xfVNl0RS9iY4+zygCRucweMZRxaHUXy7KJGsUTdzqh9dQlT+mu4Bmf1kE/rE oT8NMJo3p6twaPTSRxysY56v7wCLAc3QCJEHXXiYKuVPibVVe6GYWWsYIHaqc+wI oFwAPNl8wSjvrRW8jrqVuWKnKVWRCR88wlKLVvD03chheaPzQSGINTB9wDklaAaj SZXJQlf3JDo5e0rRg4DzZoPjoe0C7FANx+lK9/2oF/R4Mi+o1hS3Cf7K7ao7O3M5 kCYMd/vgpWtnD+1+HXX9+cwHuggpov9+2YPYaFJU4XitsTVWSAntvaEBxiSvHEPp VcooOjQo9REYy/GFfzq7ZP8n0YrQb+T0Pz0EiMWXGal3xAn9JXvOJLcK4x5mG69b CZvEUoJFaXjNj6E6JZSCdIcOqZNFw7MD7k7CrPx1qu++XwIadAHe1vH217iEbtUz SiQD/3Glw1qS9Idx6nhgI/oYX7SW/pNX/sWrVMsv+MpXcgmZTOvHEq9GPoqHo1id ydetxPK3xuVvUgIxAiJI =m+e8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
merge 612120 612121 thanks Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: merge 612120 612121 thanks Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ We link according to the arch name. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#612120: www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386 is missing
Simon Paillard, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 03:30:48 +0100, a écrit : On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:25:10AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Wolodja Wentland, le Sun 06 Feb 2011 01:46:09 +, a écrit : http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-i386/ is missing and results in a 404. Yes, that's expected, it's http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/ for both. Where did you see that bogus URL? http://debian.org/releases/squeeze/ We link according to the arch name. Ok, that's actually collusion. In the debian manual, we separate arch name from port website name. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
