Bug#613634: [PATCH] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap

2011-05-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 11:57 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Ian, should we apply the backport from

Bug#613634: [PATCH] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap

2011-05-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Ian, should we apply the backport from 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et al?

Bug#613634: [PATCH] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap

2011-05-01 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Ian, should we apply the backport from 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et al? It's already in SVN for 2.6.32-34, seems to be in the changelog twice even, once closing #614400 and then again closing

Bug#613634: [PATCH] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap

2011-05-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Ian, should we apply the backport from 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et al? It's already in SVN for 2.6.32-34, seems to be in the changelog

Bug#613634: [PATCH] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap

2011-04-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
Ian, should we apply the backport from 64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec to squeeze for bug #613634 et al? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part