On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:40, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> The first problem was that bash completion refused to complete the .deb files.
Update your wajig copy to experience the first step in fixing this
problem. It's not as fast and smart as I want though.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-
On 9 May 2011 15:47, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
> Oh, so did you want it to remain open?
No, I'm happy that it's closed.
> gdebi doesn't parse dpkg output. All it does is tell you that the DEB
> dependencies are unsatisfiable, and doesn't even give you the option
> to proceed (not good).
>
>
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 15:48, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 9 May 2011 13:06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 12:54 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> You've closed the bug; that's fine, but I still didn't see a direct
> answer to my question:
Oh, so did you want it to remain open?
On 9 May 2011 13:06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 12:54 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
You've closed the bug; that's fine, but I still didn't see a direct
answer to my question:
>> I am probably missing something, but how does gdebi manage to do this,
>> but wajig can't?
> It
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 12:54 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 9 May 2011 07:30, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >
> > Just to confirm, you are aware that you can run "wajig install
> > {python-}reportbug_5.1.1_all.deb", and it installs both? That's the
> > reason I didn't use gdebi instead.
>
> Sorr
On 9 May 2011 07:30, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
> Just to confirm, you are aware that you can run "wajig install
> {python-}reportbug_5.1.1_all.deb", and it installs both? That's the
> reason I didn't use gdebi instead.
Sorry, I hadn't realised that.
In conclusion, I personally don't mind the
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 21:57 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 7 May 2011 11:07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >
> > Anyways, please update and test again. Try harmer it again, and tell me
> > how it was like (I fixed all your issues, except I think displaying
> > changelog is overkill).
>
> First,
On 7 May 2011 11:07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
> Anyways, please update and test again. Try harmer it again, and tell me
> how it was like (I fixed all your issues, except I think displaying
> changelog is overkill).
First, I try installing a package without its dependencies:
$ wajig install
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 17:07 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 7 May 2011 11:07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe >
> > Anyways, please update and test again. Try harmer it again, and tell me
> > how it was like (I fixed all your issues, except I think displaying
> > changelog is overkill).
>
> Thanks, will tes
On 7 May 2011 11:07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe >
> Anyways, please update and test again. Try harmer it again, and tell me
> how it was like (I fixed all your issues, except I think displaying
> changelog is overkill).
Thanks, will test again and report back. Please note, it was not
displaying changelo
Thanks a lot for thorough testing.
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 22:40 +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 07:34, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> > On 4 May 2011 01:06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >>
> >> I have used python-apt to implement this and would appreciate testing
> >> before upload to Debia
On 4 May 2011 07:34, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 01:06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
>> I have used python-apt to implement this and would appreciate testing
>> before upload to Debian, so please update your clone and report back
>> any issues.
>
> Fantastic stuff. I have installed it,
On 4 May 2011 01:06, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
> I have used python-apt to implement this and would appreciate testing
> before upload to Debian, so please update your clone and report back
> any issues.
Fantastic stuff. I have installed it, now I just need to wait until I
next install a 3rd-
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:21, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 22:52, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> On 28 March 2011 21:52, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> I never noticed, but I agree it sucks. File a bug against gdebi? Since
>> it's written in python, m
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 22:52, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 21:52, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> What do you think?
>
> I never noticed, but I agree it sucks. File a bug against gdebi? Since
> it's written in python, maybe not too hard to fix?
I'm pretty sure it is. There's a catch t
On 28 March 2011 21:52, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> What do you think?
I never noticed, but I agree it sucks. File a bug against gdebi? Since
it's written in python, maybe not too hard to fix?
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 20:37, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 21:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>
>> I think we'd be pushing it too far that way. It doesn't feel like a
>> justified use-case to add yet-another-command.
>
> I'd rather have fewer commands on the whole, but this one seems
On 28 March 2011 21:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>
> I think we'd be pushing it too far that way. It doesn't feel like a
> justified use-case to add yet-another-command.
I'd rather have fewer commands on the whole, but this one seems like
it fills out a regular set.
If "wajig install" handles
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 14:12, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 14:49, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> While trying to do the change, I realised that gdebi doesn't do
>> multiple deb file installations at a time. That's an important feature
>> that "dpkg -i" has. Is it even worth running mu
On 28 March 2011 14:49, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> While trying to do the change, I realised that gdebi doesn't do
> multiple deb file installations at a time. That's an important feature
> that "dpkg -i" has. Is it even worth running multiple gdebi commands
> for this (e.g. "gdebi pkg1.deb; gd
While trying to do the change, I realised that gdebi doesn't do
multiple deb file installations at a time. That's an important feature
that "dpkg -i" has. Is it even worth running multiple gdebi commands
for this (e.g. "gdebi pkg1.deb; gdebi pkg2.deb")? I'm not sure because
that's a heck of a lot o
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking it was the gdebi GUI.
Regards,
Graham
On 28 March 2011 19:42, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 10:19, Graham Williams wrote:
>> Does the command line use of gdebi exclude popups appearing? Seems
>> like a good idea, but I just wonder what c
On 28 March 2011 10:19, Graham Williams wrote:
> Does the command line use of gdebi exclude popups appearing? Seems
> like a good idea, but I just wonder what changes occur to interactions
> with wajig when we use gdebi instead of the current install method? If
> none, and we automatically get dep
Does the command line use of gdebi exclude popups appearing? Seems
like a good idea, but I just wonder what changes occur to interactions
with wajig when we use gdebi instead of the current install method? If
none, and we automatically get dependencies when manually installing a
.deb, then yes - we
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 21:10, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Please make wajig install use gdebi, as this then offers to install
> any missing dependencies. Another convenience. It’s useful enough that
> my brain remembers to use gdebi when I want to install a .deb
> manually, rather than wajig.
Makes s
Package: wajig
Version: 2.01
Severity: wishlist
Please make wajig install use gdebi, as this then offers to install
any missing dependencies. Another convenience. It’s useful enough that
my brain remembers to use gdebi when I want to install a .deb
manually, rather than wajig.
-- System Informati
26 matches
Mail list logo
