Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: On 04/09/2011 12:46 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. Linaro should forward this upstream. will pick it up from there. Sure; Ramana offered to do so, but didn't have time before his

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/09/2011 12:46 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. Linaro should forward this upstream. will pick it up from there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-08 Thread Loïc Minier
Hey I don't know whether a new bug should be opened in the GCC bugzilla or not for the 4.5 branch, but this is the 4.6 bugfix: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44768#c9 (this comment links it to our problem) Mageia has a backported patch:

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-08 Thread Loïc Minier
I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. -- Loïc Minier === modified file 'ChangeLog.linaro' --- ChangeLog.linaro 2010-11-27 15:24:12 + +++ ChangeLog.linaro 2010-11-27 15:30:38 + @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +2010-11-24 Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com + +

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-06 Thread Loïc Minier
Package: gcc-4.5 Version: 4.5.2-8 Severity: normal Hi See Debian #621137; gcc-4.5 4.5.2-8 misbuilds busybox: r5 is clobbered in tryexec() as gcc believes it doesn't return, but it does. This doesn't happen with Linaro GCC 4.5 or GCC 4.6, but it does happen with plain FSF 4.5.2.