Bug#621460: Accepted subversion 1.6.17dfsg-3.1 (source all amd64)

2012-06-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote: (Aside: half this NMU will be reverted or modified anyway.  I explained in #621460 why we have to be explicit about db versions, but Ondrej's NMU says libdb-dev with no qualifications.  And I'll probably revert the

Bug#621460: Accepted subversion 1.6.17dfsg-3.1 (source all amd64)

2012-06-01 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Ondřej Surý] I did reply you: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621460#34 and you didn't respond from that time at all. Yes, your reply was: | I thing it is reasonable that in your case it's probably better to | either depend directly on libdb5.1-dev + db5.1-util (and