On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 09:05 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
[...]
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils
On 09/12/2011 08:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
It should be fixed in unstable by actually supporting the new enctypes.
While ncice, that rather misses the point.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 12:46:13PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:46 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils upload?
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam The krb5 package was uploaded and I've (somewhat belatedly)
Adam marked it for acceptance at the next dinstall. What's the
Adam status of the nfs-utils upload?
My guess is they were waiting for krb5.
Remember they have
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 19:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
I've attached the patches for both packages to this mail. Phil, is it ok
for these to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? This fixes a bug that
makes squeeze
I expect to get to the krb5 package in a day or so. I expect nfs-utils
will want to up its build-depends on krb5 to 1.8.3+dfsg-4squeeze2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
I don't have checkouts handy, but my strong suspicion is that if someone
is now passing in GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE into gssd_acquire_cred and
there isn't an
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
I don't have checkouts handy, but my strong suspicion is that if someone
is now passing in GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE into gssd_acquire_cred and
there isn't an
Philipp == Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Philipp On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 01:34:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
I don't have checkouts handy, but my strong suspicion is that if
someone is now passing in
reassign 622146 nfs-kernel-server,src:krb5
found 622146 nfs-kernel-server/1:1.2.2-4
found 622146 src:krb5/1.8.3+dfsg-4
fixed 622146 nfs-kernel-server/1:1.2.4-1
fixed 622146 src:krb5/1.9.1+dfsg-1
tags 622146 patch
thanks
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
I don't have
If I get an ack from SRM i'll do the krb5 upload.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Sam,
I've also run into this bug, in the context of preparing to update nfs-utils
in Ubuntu for IPv6 support. My NFS server is running squeeze, and updating
causes the client and server to fail to negotiate as described.
It seems that it's possible to work around it by adding this single
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve Hi Sam, I've also run into this bug, in the context of
Steve preparing to update nfs-utils in Ubuntu for IPv6 support. My
Steve NFS server is running squeeze, and updating causes the client
Steve and server to fail to
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:31:36PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Steve Hi Sam, I've also run into this bug, in the context of
Steve preparing to update nfs-utils in Ubuntu for IPv6 support. My
Steve NFS server is running squeeze, and
I don't have checkouts handy, but my strong suspicion is that if someone
is now passing in GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE into gssd_acquire_cred and
there isn't an argument slot, you can leave it off.
gss_c_nt_hostbased_service has always been the default for gssd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:10:32PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Hi.
I was missing some context here.
My suspicion is that things will work
if you add
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
to the configuration of the nfs server
And make sure that the nfs
OK, I have no clue nor really any interest in debugging DES.
There is a real bug here introduced in krb5 1.7 which added enctype
negotiation . I'd expect that to create some problems for sid clients
talking to squeeze servers. There's a solution to that which involves
backporting the nfs-utils
Hi.
I was missing some context here.
My suspicion is that things will work
if you add
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
default_tgs_enctypes = des-cbc-crc
to the configuration of the nfs server
And make sure that the nfs principal on the NFS server has nothing but a
des-cbc-crc key in the KDC
On 06/06/2011 05:37 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Adding the following line in the [libdefaults] section of /etc/krb5.conf
fixed the problem for me (tm), probably not the best solution, but
works:
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-md5
It's probably better to set enable_weak_crypto=yes, does
On 06/07/2011 07:01 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
On 06/06/2011 05:37 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Adding the following line in the [libdefaults] section of /etc/krb5.conf
fixed the problem for me (tm), probably not the best solution, but
works:
permitted_enctypes = des-cbc-md5
It's probably
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk On 06/06/2011 05:37 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Adding the following line in the [libdefaults] section of
/etc/krb5.conf fixed the problem for me (tm), probably not the
best solution, but works: permitted_enctypes =
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:10:23PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Luk == Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Luk On 06/06/2011 05:37 PM, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
Adding the following line in the [libdefaults] section of
/etc/krb5.conf fixed the problem for me (tm), probably
On 04/10/2011 08:45 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 20:09:36 schrieb Luk Claes:
On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
I noticed, that nfs-common doesn't
Am Montag, 11. April 2011, 18:28:45 schrieb Luk Claes:
On 04/10/2011 08:45 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 20:09:36 schrieb Luk Claes:
On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
After installing nfs-common 1:1.2.3-2 on clients (unstable) the nfs-kernel-
server in squeeze denies access for kerberized nfs exports.
syslog on the server (squeeze) gives:
rpc.svcgssd[1049]: ERROR:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
[...]
Why ipv6?
Ben.
I noticed, that nfs-common doesn't depend on librpcsecgss3 anymore and tried
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
[...]
Why ipv6?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
[...]
Why ipv6?
Ben.
I noticed, that nfs-common doesn't
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 20:09:36 schrieb Luk Claes:
On 04/10/2011 06:10 PM, Rico Rommel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2011, 17:57:11 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 17:48 +0200, Rico Rommel wrote:
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6
32 matches
Mail list logo
