Dominik George dixit:
>I do know that xloadimage has long been dropped upstream. It could be
>said that Debian, with the large set of patches it carries, might be the
>de facto maintainer of xloadimage as a whole.
With my hats “MirBSD maintainer” and “heavy xloadimage user”
(but not with my
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for contributing your views on xloadimage and xli!
> I do not know the history of xloadimage and xli.
Neither do I. I am maintaining xloadimage inside Debian because it is a
package quite some people use (and has a history of security issues, so
someone should care about
Package: xloadimage
Version: 4.1-16.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi,
I do not know the history of xloadimage and xli. The latter looks to
be a (relatively) better maintained fork of the former. So I use
the latter instead of the former (though that's probably due to
ignorance more than
3 matches
Mail list logo
