On 02/05/2011 00:06, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben Hutchingsb...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I run what I imagine is a fairly unusual disk setup on my laptop,
consisting of:
ssd - raid1 -
On Mon, 02 May 2011 11:11:25 +0200, David Brown da...@westcontrol.com wrote:
This is not directly related to your issues here, but it is possible to
make a 1-disk raid1 set so that you are not normally degraded. When you
want to do the backup, you can grow the raid1 set with the usb disk,
On 02/05/11 18:38, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 11:11:25 +0200, David Brownda...@westcontrol.com wrote:
This is not directly related to your issues here, but it is possible to
make a 1-disk raid1 set so that you are not normally degraded. When you
want to do the backup,
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I run what I imagine is a fairly unusual disk setup on my laptop,
consisting of:
ssd - raid1 - dm-crypt - lvm - ext4
I use the raid1 as a
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I run what I imagine is a fairly unusual disk setup on my laptop,
consisting of:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 01:00:57 +0100 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
I
On 05/01/2011 08:00 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Hi, Ben. Can you explain why this is not expected to work? Which part
exactly is not expected to work and why?
Adding another type of disk controller (USB storage versus whatever
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 20:42 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 05/01/2011 08:00 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Hi, Ben. Can you explain why this is not expected to work? Which part
exactly is not expected to work and why?
On Mon, 02 May 2011 02:04:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 20:42 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
So far as I'm aware, the RAID may stop working, but without loss of data
that's already on disk.
What exactly does RAID may stop working mean? Do you
#624343: linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64: frequent message bio
} too big device md0 (248 240) in kern.log
}
} On Mon, 02 May 2011 01:00:57 +0100 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
} wrote:
}
} On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 15:06 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
} On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 05:39:40 +0100, Ben
On 05/01/2011 08:22 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
However if there is another layer in between md and the filesystem - such as
dm - then there can be problem.
There is no mechanism in the kernl for md to tell dm that things have
changed, so dm never changes its configuration to match any change in the
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As you can see from the kern.log snippet below, I am seeing frequent
messages reporting bio too big device md0 (248
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As you can see from the kern.log snippet below, I am seeing frequent
messages reporting bio too big device md0 (248 240).
I run what I imagine is a fairly unusual disk setup on my laptop,
I am starting to suspect that these messages are in face associated with
data loss on my system. I have witnessed these messages occur during
write operations to the disk, and I have also started to see some
strange behavior on my system. dhclient started acting weird after
these messages
14 matches
Mail list logo
