retitle 624768 RFH: libnss-db
reassign 624768 wnpp
thank you
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 22:58, Peter Palfrader wea...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011, Ondrej Surý wrote:
Well, libnss-ldap(d) + NSCD could do the trick for short offline
periods (with HA LDAP setup).
2011/5/1 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 15:28:01 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I propose libnss-db removal from testing and stable, because it:
- has a serious security bug in stable and testing
- is unmaintained in upstream (removed from glibc, no upstream)
- is
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 14:30:13 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
One alternative would be to adopt the package both in debian and as a
upstream (or convince (e)glibc people to pick it up) and care about it
if it's important for Debian.
I don't know the Debian infrastructure enough to be able to
I am Ccing the DSA team, because this affect them most...
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 19:54, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 14:30:13 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
One alternative would be to adopt the package both in debian and as a
upstream (or convince (e)glibc
On Mon, 02 May 2011, Ondrej Surý wrote:
Well, libnss-ldap(d) + NSCD could do the trick for short offline
periods (with HA LDAP setup).
http://wiki.debian.org/LDAP/NSS
I don't think libpam-ldap would meet our requirements. And nscd is best
avoided.
--
| .''`.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
I propose libnss-db removal from testing and stable, because it:
- has a serious security bug in stable and testing
- is unmaintained in upstream (removed from glibc, no upstream)
- is
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 15:28:01 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
I propose libnss-db removal from testing and stable, because it:
- has a serious security bug in stable and testing
- is unmaintained in upstream (removed from glibc, no upstream)
- is unmaintained in Debian (security bug open for
7 matches
Mail list logo
