Bug#625847: Newer unattended-upgrades mails even if there aren't packages on hold

2019-05-24 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Sean, Sean Whitton ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 24., P, 19:45): > > Hello Balint, > > On Thu 23 May 2019 at 09:19PM +02, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > > I believe what you would like to see fixed is described in #924554, > > which is already scheduled to be in Buster. > > Thank you for this fix!

Bug#625847: Newer unattended-upgrades mails even if there aren't packages on hold

2019-05-24 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Balint, On Thu 23 May 2019 at 09:19PM +02, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I believe what you would like to see fixed is described in #924554, > which is already scheduled to be in Buster. Thank you for this fix! Maybe #625847 should be closed? I'm sorry for not doing enough homework to figure

Bug#625847: Newer unattended-upgrades mails even if there aren't packages on hold

2019-05-23 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Sean, Sean Whitton ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 23., Cs, 3:09): > > control: retitle -1 Option to send an e-mail only if packages were upgraded > control: severity -1 normal > > Hello, > > unattended-upgrades in stretch would not send an e-mail unless packages > were actually upgraded. The

Bug#625847: Newer unattended-upgrades mails even if there aren't packages on hold

2019-05-22 Thread Sean Whitton
control: retitle -1 Option to send an e-mail only if packages were upgraded control: severity -1 normal Hello, unattended-upgrades in stretch would not send an e-mail unless packages were actually upgraded. The version in buster sends an e-mail daily even if there is nothing to do -- no