On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:03:28 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[...]
I think technical minded users would appreciate the same level of options
currently provided by apt-get ran as root, ie. to be able to upgrade selected
RC-buggy packages while pinning others.
To me, it is of paramount
On 19 March 2013 07:07, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
What follows is a somewhat
verbose justification and answer to some of your previous questions.
Responses should go to #628996 only, please.
Excluding your address
Hi guys,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:07:20AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
[...]
On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
[..]
ยท -n, --force-no Assumes that you select no for all questions.
This
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:34:03PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
Control: reopen 628996
Control: retitle 628996 apt-listbugs: please use debconf
#Control: tags 628996 - moreinfo
On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52
On 18 March 2013 18:56, Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org wrote:
No doubt the current behaviour of noop is not doing apt-listbugs justice.
I agree that debconf is generally the best way to handle a situation where
terminal interaction may or may not be possible.
But as far as I understand,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
[...]
On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
[...]
Debconf may provide a suitable interface there
Please see the bug log of #628996 for
Control: reopen 628996
Control: retitle 628996 apt-listbugs: please use debconf
#Control: tags 628996 - moreinfo
On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
[...]
Debconf may provide a suitable interface
7 matches
Mail list logo
