On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:33:05PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the build-arch target appears to
be
* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [120320 21:48]:
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the build-arch target appears to
be implemented. If so, it
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the build-arch target appears to
be implemented. If so, it should use debian/rules build-arch to
build the
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the build-arch target appears to
be implemented. If so, it should use debian/rules build-arch to
build the package instead of debian/rules
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the build-arch target appears to
be implemented. If so, it should
Russ Allbery writes (Bug#629385: Request for TC to rule on a course of action
for supporting build-arch):
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
A. dpkg-buildpackage, when doing a binary-only build (-B), should probe
the package with make -qn to see if the
#part sign=pgpmime
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:33:05 -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Hearing no objections, I call for a TC vote on the following ballot:
I vote AB.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I believe that the discussion of this has reached a conclusion and the
dpkg maintainers are moving forward with an implementation. At this
point, it seems like the right thing for the Technical Committee to do is
to affirm that we agree with the approach arrived at.
I propose the following
Hi,
I have a 6th (?) proposal.
Lintian recently got checks for finding packages without build-arch and
build-indep targets. Currently it finds some 5600 packages and with the
current rate it will take nearly 2 years to fix all of them.
As pointed out earlier, only packages building both
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
As pointed out earlier, only packages building both arch:all and
non-arch:all packages benefit from this. With this in mind, we can
trivially create a new lintian tag that finds source packages building
arch:all + non-arch:all packages without
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
This actually reads to me the same as option 1. What distinction are you
meaning to draw here? It's not very direct use of build-arch if we're
checking 'make -qn' first. The only other differences I see here are
issuing a warning, and explicitly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:41:18AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
If this were to be put to a vote today, I would propose the following ballot
options:
1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
'debian/rules
(Bcc to debian-dpkg for info)
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
If this were to be put to a vote today, I would propose the following ballot
options:
1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
'debian/rules build' by checking for the presence of the
Hi,
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
3) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
'debian/rules build' if a Build-Options field is set in debian/control
of the source package specifying that this target is supported.[3]
FYI with the recent
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place
of 'debian/rules build' by checking for the presence of the
target using 'make -qn'.
From Lucas's test in 2007,[2] Of those 1823 packages, 31 packages failed
to build. Logs
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/06/11 at 13:35 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Happens; do you have any recollection of what the failures were
from? [Just trying to make sure that they were failures which were
fixable, and not some kind of unforeseen systematic problem.]
No,
16 matches
Mail list logo
