On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 10:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Possibly... either way, lintian and debhelper should be consistent about
> > what they consider to be a "good enough" reason to pre-depend (this could
> > become a debhelpe
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 09:24:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But, do we risk getting a false negative for cases where the real file has
> > a weird filename whereas the soname (as provided by the symlink) follows one
> > of the s
I think the patterns I used for this check were based on others already in
use in lintian. I agree that this should probably only be applied to real
files, not to compat symlinks.
But, do we risk getting a false negative for cases where the real file has
a weird filename whereas the soname (as pr
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.0
Severity: normal
I've been converting libdbus/experimental to multiarch. It has nearly the
layout you'd expect, except that the shared library is in /lib:
libdbus-1-dev
/usr/lib/MULTIARCH/libdbus-1.a
/usr/lib/MULTIARCH/libdbus-1.so -> /lib/MULTI
4 matches
Mail list logo
