Hello,
On penktadienis 29 Liepa 2011 15:24:10 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote:
What do you think about taking this further and supporting expressions
like cpuattr:value (or cpuattr-value, or cpuattr=value, or whatever
other syntax) in the architecture
Hi,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Modestas Vainius wrote:
What do you think about taking this further and supporting expressions like
cpuattr:value (or cpuattr-value, or cpuattr=value, or whatever other syntax)
in the architecture wildcards (Dpkg::Arch::debarch_is()). In this particular
case:
*
owner 630342 mo...@debian.org
thanks
Hello,
On pirmadienis 13 Birželis 2011 09:08:22 Guillem Jover wrote:
There's several packages which are either listing each 32/64 bit
architecture in a different arch tag, or duplicating whole symbol
files for each of those. Now that dpkg-dev has the
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.0
Severity: wishlist
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-gensymbols
Hi!
There's several packages which are either listing each 32/64 bit
architecture in a different arch tag, or duplicating whole symbol
files for each of those. Now that dpkg-dev has the
4 matches
Mail list logo
