Bug#635181: subversion: javahl BasicTests.testLogDate fails (expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992)

2011-07-26 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Peter Samuelson wrote: The Subversion high-level Java bindings ('javahl') in Debian have gone through 3 different compilers (Jikes, Kaffe, and now gcj) and none of them could make all the tests pass. [etc] Thanks for explaining. What is the state of the Java build and runtime world?

Bug#635181: subversion: javahl BasicTests.testLogDate fails (expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992)

2011-07-25 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jonathan Nieder] | There was 1 failure: | 1) testLogDate(org.tigris.subversion.javahl.BasicTests)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992 |at org.tigris.subversion.javahl.BasicTests.testLogDate(BasicTests.java:91) |at

Bug#635181: subversion: javahl BasicTests.testLogDate fails (expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992)

2011-07-25 Thread Michael Diers
On 2011-07-25 18:24, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Jonathan Nieder] | There was 1 failure: | 1) testLogDate(org.tigris.subversion.javahl.BasicTests)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992 |at

Bug#635181: subversion: javahl BasicTests.testLogDate fails (expected:1191466852134992 but was:1191423652134992)

2011-07-23 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Source: subversion Version: 1.6.17dfsg-1 Severity: minor Justification: cosmetic Tags: upstream When building subversion from source, I see | /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -Dtest.rootdir=/tmp/subversion-1.6.17dfsg/BUILD/subversion/bindings/javahl/test-work -Dtest.fstype=