On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
vtk 5.8 has been uploaded to my public space on vasks:
https://alioth.debian.org/~malat-guest/vtk/
I could not push to mentors for some reason. This is a /minimal/
package, I did not turn any new option on,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:31 +0100, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
On 2011-08-29 07:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:31 +0100, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
On 2011-08-29 07:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Steve M. Robbinsst...@sumost.ca wrote:
I think the rest of this
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:58:33AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Meanwhile could someone please NMU vtk-5.6 with the proper
fix and fix for lintian.
I will do an NMU that overrides the lintian errors, which will unblock
VTK and give us time to properly deal with the embedded libraries.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
I think the rest of this thread got off onto a tangent. In my mind,
the germane question is not why Paraview embeds a patched VTK source
tree but, rather: why is the paraview binary package now installing
the VTK tools
On 2011-08-29 07:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Steve M. Robbinsst...@sumost.ca wrote:
I think the rest of this thread got off onto a tangent. In my mind,
the germane question is not why Paraview embeds a patched VTK source
tree but, rather: why is the paraview
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 13:31 +0100, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
On 2011-08-29 07:14, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Steve M. Robbinsst...@sumost.ca wrote:
I think the rest of this thread got off onto a tangent. In my mind,
the germane question is not why
Hi,
I see that as maintainer of VTK you were not on the CC: list, so I'm
forwarding this email
to you directly: do you think it would be much work to build an
experimental vtk5.8 package?
regards
Alastair McKinstry
Original Message
Subject:Re: Bug#637397: Possible
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 13:31 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
1) Disable python-support in paraview;
2) Claim, that paraview conflicts with python-vtk;
3) get in touch with
Le dimanche 28 août 2011 à 17:30 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
wrote:
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 13:31 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
1) Disable python-support in paraview;
On 2011-08-28 16:47, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le dimanche 28 août 2011 à 17:30 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Sylvestre Ledrusylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 13:31 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
Paraview is really not an easy source to package.
Now the debian-directory is rewritten almost completely to make the
packaging as simple as possible. I prefer to escape overpatching,
because it complicates a maintainance.
I am afraid, that replacing the vtk is not an easy work. It can
produce
Le dimanche 28 août 2011 à 21:23 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
Paraview is really not an easy source to package.
Now the debian-directory is rewritten almost completely to make the
packaging as simple as possible. I prefer to escape overpatching,
because it complicates a maintainance.
Well,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:23:56 +0300, Anton Gladky wrote:
I prefer to escape overpatching, because it complicates a
maintainance.
So does having to fix bugs 50 times instead of one because a library is
copied all over the place.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:47:50PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
It was tolerated that paraview be build with the convenient VTK
library, but now the package are now installing vtk related tools
(tools that are already installed by VTK-* package), eg:
I think the rest of this thread got
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 08:30:50PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le dimanche 28 août 2011 à 21:23 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
Paraview is really not an easy source to package.
Now the debian-directory is rewritten almost completely to make the
packaging as simple as possible. I prefer
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
1) Disable python-support in paraview;
2) Claim, that paraview conflicts with python-vtk;
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le samedi 27 août 2011 à 13:31 +0300, Anton Gladky a écrit :
I see only 2 opportunities to fix it:
1) Disable python-support in paraview;
2) Claim, that paraview conflicts with python-vtk;
3) get in touch with upstream and ask them to consider changing the name
of the binary.
;)
Sylvestre
18 matches
Mail list logo
