❦ 4 novembre 2012 02:35 CET, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net :
These three are now also done. Definable keys:
unshare.net
unshare.sysvipc
unshare.sysvsem
unshare.uts
Hi Roger!
What about unshare.pid? Do you want me to open a separate bug about this
one or could we just reopen #637870?
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 4 novembre 2012 02:35 CET, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net :
These three are now also done. Definable keys:
unshare.net
unshare.sysvipc
unshare.sysvsem
unshare.uts
Hi Roger!
What about unshare.pid? Do you
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:46:31PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Recent Linux kernels allow more advanced isolation than just
chrooting. From clone(2) manpage, those possibilities exist:
- CLONE_NEWPID: new PID namespace, including the fact that when the
initial process dies (in case of
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 02:03:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:46:31PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Recent Linux kernels allow more advanced isolation than just
chrooting. From clone(2) manpage, those possibilities exist:
- CLONE_NEWPID: new PID namespace,
Package: schroot
Version: 1.4.23-1
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Recent Linux kernels allow more advanced isolation than just
chrooting. From clone(2) manpage, those possibilities exist:
- CLONE_NEWPID: new PID namespace, including the fact that when the
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:46:31PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Recent Linux kernels allow more advanced isolation than just
chrooting. From clone(2) manpage, those possibilities exist:
- CLONE_NEWPID: new PID namespace, including the fact that when the
initial process dies (in case of
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du lundi 15 août 2011, vers
15:18, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net disait :
The main problem preventing its use is the current architecture of
schroot, particularly when using sessions. When a session is created,
it's created by one schroot
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 15 août 2011, vers 16:49, je
disais:
The main problem preventing its use is the current architecture of
schroot, particularly when using sessions. When a session is created,
it's created by one schroot invocation, used in a separate invocation
and
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:51:48PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 15 août 2011, vers 16:49, je
disais:
The main problem preventing its use is the current architecture of
schroot, particularly when using sessions. When a session is created,
it's
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 15 août 2011, vers 17:23, Roger
Leigh rle...@codelibre.net disait :
% ls /proc/self/ns
ipc net uts
There's no mnt namespace here, which might be an issue. This is with
Linux 3.0.0. Maybe it's not supported in /proc yet?
Yes, no mnt, no pid. It
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:00:00PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 15 août 2011, vers 17:23, Roger
Leigh rle...@codelibre.net disait :
% ls /proc/self/ns
ipc net uts
There's no mnt namespace here, which might be an issue. This is with
Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo
