El 9 de gener de 2012 0:10, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
Please could you try the package at
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/sysvinit/sysvinit_2.88dsf-19.dsc
Let me know if the postinst logic is acceptable to you. It works for me,
and the increasing delay should work for all
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:25:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
I didn't notice this was actually a Release Goal [1]. Tagging appropiately.
I should note that the patch I sent has an unwanted side-effect:
unability to send messages to init until after first reboot, which
means first reboot
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 11:22:41AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:25:53PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
I didn't notice this was actually a Release Goal [1]. Tagging appropiately.
I should note that the patch I sent has an unwanted side-effect:
unability to send
Hi Roger,
Thanks for looking at this.
El 8 de gener de 2012 12:22, Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org ha escrit:
How about on upgrade we symlink /run/initctl → /dev/initctl if
/run/initctl does not exist?
Programs can therefore be switched to using /run/initctl immediately.
This seems fine,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:51:03PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi Roger,
Thanks for looking at this.
El 8 de gener de 2012 12:22, Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org ha escrit:
How about on upgrade we symlink /run/initctl → /dev/initctl if
/run/initctl does not exist?
Programs can therefore
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:15, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
I thought about it a bit more, and the symlink is not needed.
If we create /run/initctl and re-exec init, it will then open the
new pipe. We can then delete the old one and the process is
complete. This can be done
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 02:26:52PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:15, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
I thought about it a bit more, and the symlink is not needed.
If we create /run/initctl and re-exec init, it will then open the
new pipe. We can then
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:56, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
The postinst currently calls init u, but I think that's problematic--
it would call the new binary using the new path.
On the contrary, isn't this precisely what we wanted? No symlink needed then.
--
Robert Millan
--
El 8 de gener de 2012 15:00, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:56, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
The postinst currently calls init u, but I think that's problematic--
it would call the new binary using the new path.
On the contrary, isn't this
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 8 de gener de 2012 15:00, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:56, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
The postinst currently calls init u, but I think that's problematic--
it would call
El 8 de gener de 2012 15:14, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
The problem is that there isn't a signal to force a re-exec. You
have to do it through the control pipe.
Ah I see. In retrospect, this seems like a bad decision. Well, gotta
work with what we've got...
init u sends
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:34:13PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 8 de gener de 2012 15:14, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
path, init u on its own won't work. I would suggest this strategy:
1) Create /run/initctl
2) Symlink /dev/initctl (or /etc/.initctl) to /run/initctl
El 8 de gener de 2012 16:20, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
If we don't do that, then we are left running the old /sbin/init binary,
which is an important part of the upgrade.
Only until reboot. A reboot is necessary for the upgrade anyway
(needed by kernel).
Or if telinit/init
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 8 de gener de 2012 16:20, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
If we don't do that, then we are left running the old /sbin/init binary,
which is an important part of the upgrade.
Only until reboot. A reboot is
El 8 de gener de 2012 16:47, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
No, 2) is replacing with a symlink, while 6) is removing the
now unneeded symlink. I noticed that if you mv /dev/initctl
/dev/initctl.old, init (I presume) immediately recreates
/dev/initctl.
The following sequence
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 8 de gener de 2012 15:00, Robert Millan r...@debian.org ha escrit:
El 8 de gener de 2012 14:56, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net ha escrit:
The postinst currently calls init u, but I think that's problematic--
it would call
user rle...@debian.org
usertag 638019 run-transition
thanks
I didn't notice this was actually a Release Goal [1]. Tagging appropiately.
I should note that the patch I sent has an unwanted side-effect:
unability to send messages to init until after first reboot, which
means first reboot can't be
17 matches
Mail list logo
