On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:56:48AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...
Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7
On 2011-09-01 12:35, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:56:48AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...
Last I checked
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:08:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
Can the release team please review this ?
Package: libdap11
Conflicts:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37:31 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:08:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
Can
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...
Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
anyway, so that will need a source upload.
Thanks, let me
Use the version in unstable to build against.
A header file and not just a symbol were removed; i'm not sure whats
involved
in making gdal build against it.
To my understanding, no other package directly uses libdap, but rather
links it
via gdal, but they will need to be rebuilt once gdal is
Hi,
I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
Can the release team please review this ?
regards
Alastair
On 2011-08-25 18:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
libdap11 also has suspicious Breaks/Conflicts/Replaces: libdap10 and there
must be a proper transition from
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
Can the release team please review this ?
Package: libdap11
Conflicts: libdap10
Breaks: libdap10
Replaces: libdap10
Why? None of this seems necessary
When do you expect to upload into unstable the exerimental version of
libdap11 that fixes this issue?
I just ran into the problem when upgrading my sid chroot, and would
love to have a fix in unstable soon.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
libdap11 also has suspicious Breaks/Conflicts/Replaces: libdap10 and there
must be a proper transition from libdap10 to libdap11 and apparently from
monolithic libdap* to per-soname packages, with proper coordination.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
10 matches
Mail list logo
