Ben Hutchings wrote:
--- a/scripts/mkcompile_h
+++ b/scripts/mkcompile_h
@@ -58,6 +58,13 @@
if [ -n $SMP ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS=SMP; fi
if [ -n $PREEMPT ] ; then CONFIG_FLAGS=$CONFIG_FLAGS PREEMPT; fi
UTS_VERSION=$UTS_VERSION $CONFIG_FLAGS $TIMESTAMP
+
+DISTRIBUTION=$(lsb_release -is
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname output? Maybe it
can be added to kernel version string, uname -v (now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17
05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname
reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1
quit
Hi Touko,
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and
tags 638878 + moreinfo
thanks
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname
I'd argue that the proper place for this change is in uname(2) rather
than uname(1). Maybe a kernel developer can explain why the syscall
doesn't simply present all the information? (I think there's a limit in
the structure size, but that's been increased before...)
Mike Stone
--
To
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:54:49AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1
quit
Hi Touko,
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname too.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:10:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but then the uname commands
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:10AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
tags 638878 + moreinfo
thanks
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but then the uname commands probably work for almost every other
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:54 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but
13 matches
Mail list logo
